Thursday, December 15, 2005
Science in Wikipedia as accurate as Encyclopaedia Britannica
8 serious errors were found, 4 in each encyclopaedia. Slightly more factual errors were found in Wikipedia (163 v 132 for E.B).
See article on BBC
It is pretty remarkable given than Wikipedia is entirely edited by volunteers. It also brings some faith back into the value and quality of open source knowledge, given the recent issues with Adam Curry (The original podcaster :-) and John Seigenthaler Sr.
Wednesday, December 14, 2005
Martell Cognac Blog: Conversation NOT Flowing!
Seth Godin on e-marketing
I have been a convert of Seth's marketing philosophy for years but with hindsight, I am now casting a more critical eye on his assertions. Seth predicted that banner ads will disappear in 2000… While paid search is attracting more online marketing budget, "interruptive advertising", be it banners, pop-ups or eyeblasters is still a major eyesore on the internet landscape. Why? Because it works. It gets you noticed and it delivers click through. And conceptually, I don’t see the difference between displaying a banner about the new Jeep on an online automotive magazine, and pushing an announcement about that same car in a subscribed automotive RSS feed...
Tuesday, December 13, 2005
Opinmind : mostly positive sentiments
One interesting feature is how it categorises results between positive and negative opinions with a "sentimeter". I typed "bird flu" and the positive results came up with "love", "good" or "awesome" in the sentence while the negative have "hate" or "sucks" or "stupid". It looks like the sentimeter matches keywords according to their proximity in a sentence. Probably pulling from a dictionary of negative and positive qualifiers. This works well for opinions which are expressed “directly” but could miss more subtle comments. There is also a risk that one whole post will be judged based on one sentence. i.e. the whole post is positive but there is one sentence containing "hate" and the term you search for too close together).
Nonetheless, I think that it is great to have a tool like Opinmind freely available. I am sure it will grow and improve with time.
You can read the Opinmind blog here.
via Micropersuasion
Monday, December 12, 2005
Nabaztag, the smartest rabbit on the Internet
Thursday, December 08, 2005
The Consumerist
Worth keeping an eye on anyway.
Wednesday, December 07, 2005
The Phelps Group Adds Cedarlane Natural Foods And Whatever To Its Roster And I Am Fed Up With Receiving Your Press Releases
This is the kind of email I receive almost daily in my mailbox. No message, just a copy and paste of a press release in an email. This one is from Bahareh Ramin, media contact for the Phelps Group. I was close to put his email address here on the spur of the moment...
I don't know who the Phelps Group is. I bet I am not alone. What on earth is "workforce testing services?". May be Phelps Groups or PSI are famous in the US. But I am based in London. Why should I care? OK, my blog talks about marketing and PR, but mostly from an online perspective. Why emailing me this press release? Does the Phelps Group get the email addresses of all bloggers remotely related to marketing and bombard them blindly with emails in the hope that one of them will say: "wow! how did I live without knowing that! I must post the entire press release at once on my blog and that will certainly attract millions of readers who will join me and the prestigious Phelps Group in celebrating that glorious account win."
If you want to engage me, at least make an effort of being relevant. And a note saying "hi, this is why I am sending you this" will be appreciated as well.
Monday, December 05, 2005
Blogging the shoposphere
Tuesday, November 29, 2005
Million dollar homepage: why didn’t I think of that!
There are now hundreds of copycat websites, some of them with interesting twists on the concepts, other just simple rip-offs. Someone is even selling a script to “create your own million dollar homepage”…
Hats-off to Alex. It is a one-off but will definitely be part of Internet advertising history. On a personal level, AdRants summarises my feeling well in true “Onion” style: “Million dollar homepage causes entrepreneurial depression".
Thursday, November 24, 2005
We are human, after all.
via Seth Godin
Wednesday, November 23, 2005
Ikea blog: better do it yourself
I also found a "boycott Ikea" in Italian to counter balance that.
via Micropersuasion... again... (yes, I do read other blogs!)
Google: click to call adwords
via Micropersuasion
Mashups: XBOX 360 inventory google map locator
See more Google maps mashups on Googlemapsmania.
Tuesday, November 22, 2005
Can you be sued because of what you say in your blog?
Based on my limited legal knowledge, these are the common blogging legal pitfalls I identified:
- Breach of copyright: reproducing someone else content without permission. Grey area since bloggers often reproduce articles to comment on...
- Breach of employer's contract, especially releasing proprietary or confidential information.
- Libel: you are insulting and causing prejudice to someone (the plaintiff must show that he/she occured damages).
- Publishing false or malicious information (for example to get a share price to rise or spreading false rumours about a product being defective to kill a competitor's sales...)
Apparently, you could be sued because of the comments posted on your blog too...
The Electronic Frontier Foundation has a legal guide for bloggers (this is based on US law only).
Wednesday, November 16, 2005
Advertisers to sponsor podcasts
Via Tech based marketing
Tuesday, November 15, 2005
Podcasting for children: how bloggers turned into iPod story-tellers
It is a wonderful idea. Advertisers should get in early with some "embedded and non-intrusive" audio messages as I am sure they will prove popular.
See the storynory website
Does Google know where it is going?
Peter Day runs a column on the BBC website called “Work in Progres”, linking business and technology to wider issues (a bit like Business 2.0 but with less superlatives).
The premise of his article on Google (see “Google searches for the future”) is that Google’s success is due to its lack of strategy. Don’t get him wrong, he is not saying that the company lacks direction but that Google adapts its priorities and focus according to the evolving potential and successes of its countless search based projects. In Peter’s words: “Its (Google) people start things, and then work out how to make money out of them”.
So far Google's PhDs army dabbled into advertising (adwords and possibly print), pictures filing, call/IM, blogs, price comparison, emails, mapping the earth and digitising its books and recently web analytics… Yet, its main (only?) source of revenue is selling ads.
Either Google has a master plan than common mortals cannot comprehend or it is on a fuzzy path to somewhere yet to be determined but promising.
This lack of apparent strategy worked well so far and with every pundit watching Google's every move, generates a lot of publicity. Will Google turn-up as a telecom company? The new E-Bay? The largest media placement agency? Or just the most used and revered search engine in the world?
I don’t know. But it is a fascinating case of reinventing business rules.
If you want more clues at to what Google has in store, you can buy a CD containing Google related patents… (Xmas is approaching fast).
Monday, November 14, 2005
Tesco Supermarkets Launch Deal Of The Day RSS Feed
via NevOn.
Thursday, November 10, 2005
Accenture Launch Dutch Blogs
Via Micropersuasion, who was tipped by Pablo Halkyard although I could not find his original post on the subject. Nonetheless, I am referencing his blog. Here is why: "The Private Sector Development Blog (PSD Blog) gathers together news, resources and ideas about the role of private enterprise in fighting poverty". Great resources for my forthcoming economy classes!